Antropoceno, cambio climático y modelo social
- Luis Moreno 1
- Daniele Conversi 2
-
1
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
info
-
2
Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
info
Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Lejona, España
ISSN: 0417-8106
Datum der Publikation: 2016
Titel der Ausgabe: Cambio climático y crisis socioambiental
Nummer: 183
Seiten: 13-30
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: Documentación social
Zusammenfassung
El Antropoceno es una nueva era geológica provocada por la acción de los seres humanos. El cambio climático es consecuencia de una idea de progreso abocada a la catástrofe socioambiental. El examen del neoliberalismo pretende desentrañar las causas de una degradación sistemática de los recursos geológicos y de sus efectos asociales e insolidarios. La prevalente ideología consumista ha sido auspiciada por la promoción de un individualismo posesivo basado en el cálculo personal e interesado. Se pondera si la presente «Edad de Bronce del welfare» es el preludio de una vuelta a la prehistoria de la protección social. En las conclusiones se señala la gran responsabilidad de las ciencias sociales y políticas para proveer enfoques superadores de la inevitabilidad del desastre socioambiental. La preservación de un modelo socioeconómico que respete un desarrollo sostenible y evite la pobreza es crucial para el mantenimiento del bienestar social.
Bibliographische Referenzen
- ANTILLA, L. (2010): «Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points», Public Understanding of Science, 19 (2): 240-256.
- BALES, K. (1999): Disposable People. New Slavery in the Global Economy. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press (Ed. revisada).
- BALES, K. (2004): New Slavery: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara (CA): ABC-CLIO.
- BERKES, F., FOLKE, C. y GADGIL, M. (1995): «Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Biodiversity, Resilience and Sustainability», en C. A. Perrings et al. (eds.) Biodiversity Conservation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- BOYCE, T. y LEWIS, J. (eds.) (2009): Climate Change and the Media. Oxford: Peter Lang.
- CARLSON, T. J. S. y MAFFI, L. (eds.) (2004): Ethnobotany and conservation of biocultural diversity, Bronx (NY): New York Botanical Garden Press.
- CHRISTENSEN, M., et al. (comps.) (2013): Media and the Politics of Arctic Climate Change. When the Ice Breaks, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
- CONVERSI, D. (2010): «The limits of cultural globalisation?», Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies, 1 (3): 36-59.
- CONVERSI, D. (2012): «Modernism and nationalism», Journal of Political Ideologies, 17 (1): 13-34.
- CONVERSI, D. (2016): «Sovereignty in a Changing World: From Westphalia to Food Sovereignty», Globalizations, 13 (4): 484-498.
- COOK, J., (2013): «Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature», Environmental Research Letters, 8 (2): 1-7 (024024).
- CROOK, M. y SHORT, D. (2014): «Marx, Lemkin and the genocide–ecocide nexus», The International Journal of Human Rights, 18 (3): 298-319.
- CRUTZEN, P. y STOERMER, E. (2000): «The «Anthropocene»», Global Change Newsletter, 41: 17-18.
- DELPEUCH, F., et al. (2013): Globesity: A Planet Out of Control? Londres: Taylor y Francis.
- ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. y PALIER, B. (2009): Los Tres Grandes Retos del Estado del Bienestar. Barcelona: Ariel.
- FLORA, P. (1993): «Los estados nacionales del bienestar y la integración europea», en L. Moreno (comp.) Intercambio social y desarrollo del bienestar. Madrid: CSIC.
- FRÄSS-EHRFELD, C. (2009): Renewable Energy Sources: A Chance to Combat Climate Change. Alphen aan den Rijn (NL): Kluwer Law International
- GARCÍA-OLIVARES, A. y SOLÉ, J. (2015): «End of growth and the structural instability of capitalism—From capitalism to a Symbiotic Economy», Futures, 68: 31-43.
- GINER, S. (1976): Mass Society. Nueva York: Academic Press [Ed. castellano: Sociedad Masa. Barcelona Ediçions 62, 1979].
- HACKER, J. S. y PIERSON, P. (2010): Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer —and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Nueva York: Simon y Schuster.
- HALLEGATTE, S. P., et al. (2016): Shock waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. Washington (DC): The World Bank en línea: https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22787/9781464806735.
- HAMILTON, C. (2010): Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth about Climate Change. Londres: Earthscan.
- JAMIESON, D. (2014): Reason in a Dark Time. Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed — and What It Means for Our Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- JOHANNES, R. E. (1989): Traditional ecological knowledge : a collection of essays. Gland; Cambridge: IUCN, the World Conservation Union.
- KALLIS, G., et al. (2012): «The economics of degrowth", Ecological Economics, 84: 172180.
- KENNEDY, P. (2017): Vampire Capitalism: Fractured Societies and Alternative Futures. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- KLEIN, D., et al. (2017): The Paris climate agreement : analysis and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- KOCH, M. (2012): Capitalism and climate change: theoretical discussion, historical development and policy responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- KRUGMAN, P. R. (2009): The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. Nueva York: W.W. Norton [Ed. castellano: El Retorno de la Economía de la Depresión y la Crisis Actual, Barcelona: Crítica, 2009].
- LAIRD, S. A. (2002) Biodiversity and traditional knowledge : equitable partnerships in practice. Londres; Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.
- LATOUCHE, S. (2010): Farewell to Growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- LATOUR, B. (2014): «Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene», New Literary History, 45 (1): 1-18.
- LATOUR, B. (2017): Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- LEVENE, M. y CONVERSI, D. (2014): «Subsistence societies, globalisation, climate change and genocide: discourses of vulnerability and resilience», The International Journal of Human Rights, 18 (3): 281-297.
- LOVELOCK, J. E. (1979), Gaia A new look at life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- MACPHERSON, C. B. (1962): The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: From Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press (2nd ed.) [Ed. castellano: La teoría política del inidividualismo posesivo: De Hobbes a Locke. Madrid, Trotta, 2005].
- MAFFI, L. (ed.) (2001): On Biocultural Diversity. Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.
- MCLUHAN, M. y POWERS, B. R. (1989): The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. Nueva York: Oxford University Press [Ed. castellano, La Aldea Global. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1990].
- MEADOWS, D. H. y CLUB OF ROME (1972): The Limits to Growth: A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Nueva York: Universe Books.
- MILL, J. S. (1848): Principles of political economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy Londres: Longmans, Green y Co (7 edición compilada por Ashley, William J.,: 1909 [Ed. castellano: Principios de Economía Política, Madrid: Síntesis, 2005]
- MORENO, L. (2012): La Europa Asocial. Crisis y Estado del Bienestar. Barcelona: Península.
- MORENO, L. (2014): Europa sin Estados. Unión política en el (des)orden global. Madrid: La Catarata.
- MORENO, L. (2015): Trienio de mudanzas. Espana, Europa y el mundo, 2013-15. Madrid: La Catarata.
- MORENO, L. (2016): «Post-crisis and the Bronze Age of Welfare in Europe», in S. Segado y A. López (eds.), The Ailing Welfare State, Madrid: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi
- NAESS, L. O. (2013): «The role of local knowledge in adaptation to climate change», Climate Change, 4 (2): 99-106.
- NICHOLLS, N. (2007): «Climate: Sawyer predicted rate of warming in 1972», Nature, 448 (7157): 992-992.
- O'NEILL, D. W. (2012): «Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy», Ecological Economics, 84: 221-231.
- ORESKES, N. y CONWAY, E. M. (2010): Merchants of Doubt. How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Nueva York: Bloomsbury Press.
- OXFAM (2015): Extreme Carbon Inequality. Oxford: Oxfam, en líne: https://www. oxfam.org/en/research/extreme-carbon-inequality.
- PIKETTY, T. y CHANCEL, L. (2015): Carbon and inequality: from Kyoto to Paris. Trends in the global inequality of carbon emissions (1998-2013) y prospects for an equitable adaptation fund. París: Paris School of Economics.
- POSEY, D. A. y BALICK, M. J. (eds.) (2006): Human impacts on Amazonia: the role of traditional ecological knowledge in conservation and development, Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
- ROBERTS, I. y EDWARDS, P. (2010): The Energy Glut: Climate Change and the Politics of Fatness. Londres: Zed Books.
- ROSNER, L. (ed.) (2004): The Technological Fix: How People Use Technology to Create and Solve Problems, Nueva York: Routledge.
- SACHS, J. (2015): The Age of Sustainable Development. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
- SASSEN, S. (2014): Expulsions. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
- SAWYER, J. S. (1972): «Man-made Carbon Dioxide and the «Greenhouse» Effect», Nature, 239 (5366): 23-26.
- SCHWARTZ, J. M. (2009): The Future of Democratic Equality. Rebuilding Social Solidarity in a Fragmented America. Nueva York: Routledge.
- SHRADER-FRECHETTE, K. (2011): What Will Work: Fighting Climate Change with Renewable Energy, Not Nuclear Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- SKLAIR, L. (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Malden (MA).: Blackwell.
- SKLAIR, L. (2012): «Culture-Ideology of Consumerism», en G. Ritzer (ed.) The WileyBlackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Hoboken (N.J): John Wiley y Sons.
- SKOUFIAS, E. (ed.) (2012): The Poverty and Welfare Impacts of Climate Change. Quantifying the Effects, Identifying the Adaptation Strategies, Washington (DC): World Bank.
- STEFFEN, W., et al. (2011): «The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives», Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1938): 842-867.
- TAIBO, C. (2009): En defensa del decrecimiento. Sobre capitalismo, crisis y barbarie. Madrid: La Catarata.
- UGARRIZA, J. E. y CALUWAERTS, D. (eds.) (2014): Democratic Deliberation in Deeply Divided Societies: From Conflict to Common Ground, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- VEBLEN, T.(1899): The Theory of the Leisure Class. Londres: Macmillan [Ed. castellano: Teoría de la clase ociosa. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1944].
- WATERS, C. N., et al. (2015): «Can nuclear weapons fallout mark the beginning of the Anthropocene Epoch?", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71 (3): 46-57.
- WATERS, C. N., et al. (2016): «The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene», Science, 351 (6269): aad2622.
- WILLIAMSON, J. (1989): «What Washington Means by Policy Reform», en J. Williamson (ed.) Latin American Readjustment: How Much has Happened. Washington (DC): Institute for International Economics.
- ZALASIEWICZ, J., et al. (2011a): «Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene», Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1938): 1036-1055.
- ZALASIEWICZ, J., et al. (2011b): «The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time?», Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1938): 835-841.
- ZALASIEWICZ, J., et al. (2015): «When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal», Quaternary International, 383: 196-203.
- ZIMMERER, J. (2014): «Climate change, environmental violence and genocide», The International Journal of Human Rights, 18 (3): 265-280 (special issue on «Climate change, environmental violence and genocide», Jürgen Zimmerer, editor).