Habitar las incomodidades en investigaciones feministas y activistas desde una práctica reflexiva

  1. Itziar Gandarias Goikoetxea 1
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

Revista:
Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

ISSN: 1578-8946

Ano de publicación: 2014

Volume: 14

Número: 4

Páxinas: 289-304

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1489 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

Based on an ongoing research whose purpose is to study the challenges and opportunities for the articulation of political alliances between migrant women organizations and local feminists in the Basque Country, I develop, by a reflective practice, some of the most relevant discomforts arising during this process related to: (i) move in uncertainty, (ii) assume the differences, (iii) speak about the research participants and finally, (iv) live my dual role as researcher and activist. Rather than solving, this reflexive practice is a bet to politicize feminist methodologies and claim the ethics of discomfort as an indispensable tool to live the borderlands between research and activism.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acker, Sandra (2000). In/out/side: Positioning the researcher in feminist qualitative research. Resources for Feminist Research Journal 28(1/2), 189-218.
  • Alcoff, Linda (1991). The Problem of Speaking for Others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5-32.
  • Balasch, Marcel y Montenegro, Marisela (2003). Una propuesta metodológica desde la epistemología de los conocimientos situados: Las producciones narrativas. Encuentros en Psicología Social, 1(3), 44-48.
  • Clifford, James & Marcus, Georges E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Clough, Patricia T. (1992). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Coffey, Amanda (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Edwards, Rosalind (1990). Connecting methods and epistemology: A white woman interviewing black women. Women`s Studies International Forum, 13 (5), 477- 490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(90)90100-C
  • England, Kim V. L. (1994) Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80– 89.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
  • Falconer Al-Hindi, Karen & Kawabata, Hope (2002). Toward a More Fully Reflexive Feminist Geography. En Pamela Moss (Ed.), Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods (pp. 103-115) Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Fonow, Mary Margaret & Cook, Judith. (1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. En Mary Margaret Fonow & Judith Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 1–15). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Fulladosa-Leal, Karina (2015). Creando puentes entre la formación y la creatividad: Una experiencia de investigación activista feminista. Universitas Humanística, 79, 115-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UH79.cpfc
  • Gandarias Goikoetxea, Itziar (2014). Tensiones y distensiones en torno a las relaciones de poder en investigaciones feministas con Producciones Narrativas. Quaderns de Psicologia, 16(1), 127-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1210
  • Haraway, Donna (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
  • Harding, Sandra (1991). Whose cience? Whose knowledge?Thinking for women`s lifes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Hertz, Rossana (1996). Introduction: Ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qualitative Sociology, 19(1), 3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02393245
  • Hesse- Biber, Sharlene Nagy & Piattelli, Deborah (2012). The feminist practice of holistic reflexivity. En Sharlene Nagy HesseBiber (Ed.), The handbook of feminist research: theory and practice (pp. 557-582). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ibáñez Martin, Rebeca (2014). El desconcierto como método de experimentación epistemológica En IV Congreso de la Red de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (esCTS). Salamanca, junio 2014.
  • Katz, Cindy (1996). The Expeditions of Conjurers: Ethnography, Power and Pretense. En Diane Wolf (Ed.), Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. (pp. 171-185). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Kondo, Dorinne K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender and discourses of identuty in a Japanese workplace. Chicago, II: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lal, Jayati (1996). Situating locations: The politics of self, identity and other in living and writing the text. En Diane Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 185-214). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Lather, Patti (2007). Getting Lost. Feminist Efforts toward a Double(d) Science. Albany NY: SUNY Press.
  • Martínez-Guzmán, Antar & Montenegro, Marisela (2014). La producción de narrativas como herramienta de investigación y acción sobre el dispositivo de sexo/género: Construyendo nuevos relatos. Quaderns de Psicologia, 16(1), 111- 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1206
  • Marx, Marcia (2000). Invisibility, interviewing and power. Resources for Feminist Research, 28 (3/4), 131-155.
  • Maxey, Ian (1999). Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research, Area, 31, 199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1999.tb00084.x
  • Naples, Nancy A. (2003). Feminist and method: Ethnography. Discourse analysis, and activist research. New York. Routledge.
  • Nast, Heidi (1990). Women in the Field: Critical Feminist Methodologies and Theoretical Perspectives.The Professional Geographer, 46, 1, 54-66.
  • Pantera Rosa (2004). Moverse en la incertidumbre. Dudas y contradicciones de la investigación activista. En Malo, Marta (coord.). Nociones comunes. Experiencias y ensayos entre investigación y militancia (pp. 191-205). Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Patai, Daphne (1994). When method becomes power. En Andrew Gitlen (Ed.), Power and method (pp. 61–73). New York: Routledge
  • Pedone, Claudia (2000). El trabajo de campo y los métodos cualitativos. Necesidad de nuevas reflexiones desde la geografía latinoamericana, Scripta Nova, 57, 1-20.
  • Pillow, Wanda (2003). Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Meth-odological Power in Qualitative Research. Inter-national Journal of Qualitative Studies in Educa-tion 16(2): 175-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
  • Pujol, Joan, Montenegro, Marisela & Balasch, Marcel (2003). Los límites de la metáfora lingüística: implicaciones de una perspectiva corporeizada para la práctica investigadora e interventora. Política y Sociedad 40(1), 57-70.
  • Pujol, Joan y Montenegro, Marisela (2013). Producciones narrativas: una propuesta teórico-práctica para la investigación narrativa. En Maite Rodigou Nocetti y Horacio Luis Paulín (Eds.), Coloquios de investigación cualitativa: desafíos en la investigación como relación social (pp.15-42).Córdoba: Socialex.
  • Rabinow, Paul (1977). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Smith, Dorothy (1987). The everyday world as problematic. A feminist sociology. Boston: North-eastern University Press.
  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1984–85). Criticism, feminism and the institution. Thesis Eleven, 10/11, 175–189.
  • Stacey, Judith (1991). Can there be a feminist ethnography? En Daphne Patay & Sherna B. Gluck (Eds.), Women`s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp.111-120). New York: Routledge.
  • Stanley, Liz (1990). Moments of writing: Is there a feminist auto/biography? Gender and History 2, 58-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.1990.tb00079.x
  • Wasserfall, Rahel R. (1993). Reflexivity, feminism and difference. Qualitative Sociology 16 (1), 23-41.
  • Wolf, Diane L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. En Diane L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp.1-55). Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Zavos, Alexandra & Biglia Barbara (2009). Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political practices, diffractions, and collective knowledge. Qualitative research in psychology, 6, 1-2, 153-172.
  • Zavos, Alexandra (2012). Reflexiones sobre las estrategias y las resistencias desde las políticas del conocimiento. En Cidob (Ed.), Políticas del conocimiento y dinámicas interculturales, (pp. 70-82) Barcelona: Colección Monografias Cidob.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.