Tensiones y distensiones en torno a las relaciones de poder en investigaciones feministas con Producciones Narrativas

  1. Gandarias Goikoetxea, Itziar 1
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

Revue:
Quaderns de Psicología

ISSN: 0211-3481

Année de publication: 2014

Volumen: 16

Número: 1

Pages: 127-140

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/QPSICOLOGIA.1210 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Quaderns de Psicología

Résumé

In this paper I examine from a reflective approach the methodological difficulties involved in collaborative research that are committed to building a collective knowledge. Based on an ongoing investigation I expose some of the tensions on power relations between researcher and participants emerged in the field of research. Based on a feminist and intersectional perspective I develop three proposals through which the Narratives Productions counteract the power relations that exist in any investigation a) the agency and negotiation of participating in the construction of narratives, b) consideration of Narratives Productions as theoretical starting points c) dialogue and mutual transformation between researcher and researched people. Finally I propose the reflexivity of discomfort as a key to live ethical and politically tensions and uncertainties that arise in the process of research practice.

Références bibliographiques

  • Acker, Joan; Barry, Kate y Esseveld, Joke (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6(4), 423-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(83)90035- 3
  • Adán, Carme (2006). Feminismo y Conocimiento. De la experiencia de las mujeres al cíborg. Galicia: Spiralia Ensayo.
  • Anzaldúa, Gloria (1987). Borderlands: la frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
  • Balasch, Marcel y Montenegro, Marisela (2003). Una propuesta metodológica desde la epistemología de los conocimientos situados: Las producciones narrativas. Encuentros en Psicología Social, 1(3), 44-48.
  • Bajtin, Mitjael (1982). Estética de la creación verbal. México: Siglo XXI.
  • Bhavnani, Kum-Kum (1993). Tracing the Contours: Feminist Research and Feminist Objectivity. Women’s Studies International Forum, 16(2), 95– 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277- 5395(93)90001-P
  • Biglia, Barbara y Bonet-Martí, Jordi (2009). La construcción de narrativas como método de investigación psico-social. Prácticas de escritura compartida. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Art. 8. Recuperado de http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1225
  • Cabruja, Teresa; Íñiguez, Lupicinio y Vázquez, Félix (2000). Como construimos el mundo: relativismo, espacio de relación y narratividad. Anàlisi, 25, 61-94.
  • Calás, Mary y Smircich, Linda (1996). From ‗the woman‘s‘ point of view: feminist approaches to organization studies. In Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Tom Lawrence and Walter R., Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies. (pp. 218-57). London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Castañeda, Marta Patricia (2008). Metodología de la investigación feminista. Antigua Guatemala: Fundación Guatemala, Guatemala Librería e Imprenta Evolution.
  • Chamberlaine, Kerry (2012). Do you really need a methodology? QmiP Bulletin, 13, 59-63.
  • Combahee River Collective (1977/1997). A Black feminist statement. En Linda Nicolson (Ed.), The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory (pp. 63-70). New York: Routledge.
  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. Feminist theory and antiracist politics. The university of chicago legal forum, 140, 139-167.
  • Davis, Kathy (2008) Intersectionality as a buzzword. A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory succesful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
  • Denzin, Norman K. y Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues. London: Sage.
  • England, Kim V. L. (1994) Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0033- 0124.1994.00080.x
  • Fine, Michelle (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Fonow, Mary Margaret y Judith A. Cook (Eds.) (1991). Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Foucault, Michel (1979/1999). Estética, Ética y Hermenéutica. Obras Esenciales: vol. III. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Gandarias, Itziar y Pujol, Joan (2013). De las otras al no(s)otras: encuentros, tensiones y retos en el tejido de articulaciones entre colectivos de mujeres migradas y feministas locales en el País Vasco. Encrucijadas Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, 5, 77-91.
  • Gergen, Kenneth J. (1994/1996). Realidades y relaciones: aproximaciones a la construcción social. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Gergen, Kenneth J. y Gergen, Mary M. (1983). Narratives of the self. En Theodore R. Sarbin y Karl E. Scheibe (Eds.), Studies in social identity (pp. 225-273). New York: Praeger.
  • Grewal, Inderpal (2006). Gender, culture and empire: postcolonial US feminist scholarship, Feminist Studies, 32(2), 380-394.
  • Gudmundsdottir, Smith (2001). Narrative research on school practice. In Virginia Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 226-224). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
  • Haraway, Donna (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
  • Haraway, Donna (1992). Las promesas de los monstruos: Una política regeneradora para otros inapropiados/bles. Política y Sociedad, 30, 121-163.
  • Harding, Sandra (1987/1998). ¿Existe un método feminista? En Eli Bartra, (Comp.), Debates en torno a una metodología feminista. México, DF: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 9–34. Extraído de http://201.196.149.98/cicde/images/documento s/metodo.pdf
  • Hastrup, Katherine (1992). Writing ethnography: State of the art. En Judith Okely y Helen Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and Autobiography (pp. 116-133). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy (2011). Feminist research: Exploring, Interrogating, and Transform- ing the Interconnections of Epistemology, Methodology, and Method. In Sharlene Nagy HesseBiber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (pp. 2-26). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, Paul (1988). Gender and fieldwork. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 611-18.
  • hooks, bell (2000). Feminist theory from margin to centre. London: Pluto Press.
  • Hovland, Charles; Janis, Irving y Kelley, Harold (1970). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Jackson, Stevi (1998). Telling stories: Memory, Narrative and Experience in Feminist Research and Theory. En Karen Henwood, Christine Griffin y Ann Phoenix (Eds.), Standpoints and Differences: Essays in the Practice of Feminist Psychology (pp. 45-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Juliano, Dolores (1994). Pobres mujeres o mujeres pobres. En César Manzanos, Dolores Juliano, En- rique Santamaría, Erran Iniesta, Gabriela Malgesini, Ignasi Álvarez… Verena Stolke (Eds.), Extranjeros en el paraíso (pp. 117-139). Barcelona: Virus.
  • Khan, Susan (2005). Reconfiguring the native informant: positionality in the global age. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 17-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/428423
  • Lal, Johanna (1996). Situating locations: the politics of self, identity, and 'other‘ in living and writing the text. En Diane L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork (pp. 185-214). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Lather, Patti (1988). Feminist Perspectives on Empowering Research Methodologies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(6), 569–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90110- 0
  • Liao, Hsiang-Ann (2006). Toward An Epistemology of Participatory Communication: A Feminist Perspective. Howard Journal of Communications 17(2), 101-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10646170600656854
  • Lowe, Mary y John Rennie, Short (1990). Progressive human geography. Progress in Human Geography 14, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913259001400101
  • Martínez-Guzmán, Antar y Marisela Montenegro (2010).Narrativas en torno al Trastorno de Identidad Sexual: De la multiplicidad transgénero a la producción de trans-conocimientos. Prisma Social: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 4, 1-44.
  • McCorkel, Jill A. y Myers, Kristen (2003). What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 199-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022967012774
  • Mies, Maria (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In Gloria Bowles and Renate Duelli Klein (Eds.), Theories of Women’s Studies (pp. 117-139). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Mohanty, Chandra Tapalde (2003). Under Western eyes‘ revisited: feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(2), 499-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/342914
  • Mohanty, Chandra Tapalde (2004). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Narayan, Umah (2000). Essence of culture and a sense of history: a feminist critique of cultural essentialisms. En Umah Narayan y Sandra Harding (Eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World (pp. 7-16). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Ollerenshaw, Jo Anne y Creswell, John W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10778004008003008
  • Ozkazanc-Pan, Banu (2012). Postcolonial feminist research: challenges and complexities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(5/6), 573- 591.http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02610151211235 532
  • Patai, Daphne (1991). US academics and Third World women: is ethical research possible? En Sherna Berger Gluck y Daphne Patai (Eds.), Women’s Words: Feminist Practice of Oral History (pp.137-53). New York: Routledge.
  • Pillow, Wanda (2003). Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Meth- odological Power in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16(2): 175–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095183903200006063 5
  • Pujol, Joan; Montenegro, Marisela y Balasch, Marcel (2003). Los límites de la metáfora lingüística: implicaciones de una perspectiva corporeizada para la práctica investigadora e interventora. Política y Sociedad, 40(1), 57-70.
  • Pujol, Joan y Montenegro, Marisela (2013). Producciones narrativas: una propuesta teórico-práctica para la investigación narrativa. En Maite Rodigou Nocetti y Horacio Luis Paulín (Eds.), Coloquios de investigación cualitativa: desafíos en la investigación como relación social (pp.15-42). Córdoba: Socialex.
  • Reinharz, Shulamit (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sassen, Saskia (2013). Inmigrantes y ciudadanos. De las migraciones masivas a la Europa fortaleza. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Smith, Dorothy (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Spivak, Gayatry (1988). Can the subaltern speak? En Cary Nelson and Larry Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271- 313). Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
  • Stanley, Liz (Ed.) (1990). Feminist Praxis. London: Routledge.
  • Thibaut, John y Kelley, Harold (1969). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Trinh, T. Minh-Ha (1989). Woman, native, other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Trinh, T. Minh-Ha (1991). Framer framed. New York: Routledge.