Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents

  1. Gámez Guadix, Manuel
  2. Orue Sola, Izaskun
  3. Calvete Zumalde, Esther
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Ano de publicación: 2013

Volume: 25

Número: 3

Páxinas: 299-306

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Psicothema

Resumo

Background: Problematic use of Internet is a growing concern that interferes in the family and academic life of adolescents. This study had three related objectives: 1) to analyze the psychometric properties of the Revised Generalized and Problematic Internet Use Scale (GPIUS2) among Spanish adolescents; 2) to examine the theoretical cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use; and 3) to study the relationship between the type of Internet use and generalized and problematic Internet use. Method: Participants were 1,021 adolescents in Bizkaia (55.7% girls, mean age = 14.95 years, SD = 1.71). Results: Factor analyses confirmed the internal structure of four factors originally proposed for GPIUS2, called Preference for online social interaction, Mood regulation, Deficient self-regulation, and Negative consequences. Consistent with the theoretical model, preference for online social interaction and mood regulation increased the likelihood of reporting deficient self-regulation, which, in turn, was associated with negative consequences for the adolescents. Conclusions: The GPIUS2 is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used in adolescent samples. Furthermore, the results support the cognitive behavioral model of problematic Internet use in adolescents.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
  • Bentler, P.M. (2005). EQS 6.1 for Windows. Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nded.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553-575.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625-648.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721-736.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 234-242.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089-1097.
  • Caplan, S.E., & High, A.C. (2006). Beyond excessive use: The interaction between cognitive and behavioral symptoms of problematic Internet use. Communication Research Reports, 23, 265-271.
  • Caplan, S.E., & High, A.C. (2011). Online social interaction, psychosocial well-being, and problematic Internet use. In K.S. Young & C.N. de Abreu (Eds.), Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (pp. 35-53). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  • Carbonell, X., Fúster, H., Chamarro, A., & Oberst, U. (2012). Adicción a Internet y móvil: una revisión de estudios empíricos españoles [Internet and mobile addiction: A review of Spanish empirical studies]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 33, 82-89.
  • Chou, C., & Hsiao, M.C. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: The Taiwan college students' case. Computers & Education, 35, 65-80.
  • Davis, R.A., Flett, G.L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 331-345.
  • Echeburúa, E., Labrador, F., & Becoña, E. (2010). Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías [Adiction to new tecnologies]. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa, F., & Calvete, E. (2012). Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic Internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1581-1591.
  • Griffiths M. (2000). Internet addiction-Time to be taken seriously? Addiction Research & Theory, 8, 413-418.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Jessor, R. (1991). Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health. Special Issue: Adolescents at Risk, 12, 597-605.
  • Jia, R., & Jia, H.H. (2009). Factorial validity of problematic Internet use scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1335-1342.
  • Johansson, A., & Götestam, K.G. (2004). Internet addiction: Characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12-18 years). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 223-229.
  • Junghyun, K., LaRose, R., & Wei, P. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 451-455.
  • Kim, H.-K., & Davis, K.E. (2009). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic Internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 490-500.
  • LaRose, R., Lin, C.A., & Eastin, M.S. (2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 5, 225-253.
  • LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M.S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 395.
  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Retrieved at: http:// pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx.
  • Meerkerk, G.J., van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M., Franken, I.H.A., & Garretsen, H.F.L. (2010). Is compulsive internet use related to sensitivity to reward and punishment, and impulsivity? Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 729-735.
  • Morahan-Martin, J. (2007). Internet use and abuse and psychological problems. Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 331-345). New York: Oxford University Print.
  • Shapira, N.A., Lessig, M.C., Goldsmith, T.D., Szabo, S.T., Lazoritz, M., Gold, M.S., & Stein, D.J. (2003). Problematic internet use: Proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depression and Anxiety, 17, 207-216.
  • Smahel, D., Brown, B.B., & Blinka, L. (2012). Associations between online friendship and Internet addiction among adolescents and emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 48, 381.
  • Spada, M.M., Langston, B., Nikčević, A.V., & Moneta, G.B. (2008). The role of metacognitions in problematic internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2325-2335.
  • Thatcher, A., & Goolam, S. (2005). Development and psychometric properties of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire. South African Journal of Psychology, 35, 793-809.
  • van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M., Meerkerk, G.J., Vermulst, A.A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R.C.M.E. (2008). Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 655.
  • Young, K.S. (1998). Caught in the Net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction-and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  • Young, K.S. (2007). Cognitive behavior therapy with Internet addicts: Treatment outcomes and implications. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 671-679.
  • Young, K.S., & de Abreu, C.N. (2011). Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  • Young, K.S., Yue, X.D., & Ying, L. (2011). Prevalence estimates and etiologic models of Internet addiction. In K.S. Young & C.N. de Abreu (Eds.), Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (pp. 3-17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.