Emprendedoras en el desarrollo de una empresa de base tecnológicael desafío del caso Dynakin

  1. Guerrero Cano, Maribel
  2. González Pernía, José Luis
  3. Peña Legazkue, Iñaki
Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Ano de publicación: 2012

Título do exemplar: Mujer y desafío emprendedor en España

Número: 383

Páxinas: 125-132

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Economía industrial

Resumo

An emerging area of interest for academics, entrepreneurs and policy makers is the analysis and understanding of how and where women entrepreneurs have made differences. Our case study, for example, focuses on women in academic environments who are creating new businesses based on the exploration and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities identified in their research activities. Adopting the feminist perspective, our paper tries to identify the opportunities and the challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the creation process of a technologybased enterprise within a university.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AHL, H. (2006): «Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions». Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 30, nº 5, pp. 595-621.
  • ALLEN, I.E; ELAM, N.; LANGOWITZ, N. y DEAN, M. (2008): Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report on Women and Entrepreneurship. US: Babson College.
  • ALLEN, S.D.; LINK, A. y ROSENBAUM, D. (2007): «Entrepreneurship and human capital: evidence of patenting activity from academic sector». Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, vol. 31, nº 6, pp. 937-951.
  • BUENO, E.; ACOSTA, J. y LONGO, M. (2010): «Análisis de los procesos de I+D en la generación de innovación de las empresas de base tecnológica en parques científicos y tecnológicos». RevistaEconomía Industrial, vol. 378, pp. 23-35.
  • CARTER, S. y SHAW, E. (2006): Women’s Business Ownership: Recent Research and Policy Developments. Report to the Small Business Service. London: DTI Small Business Service.
  • CORROLLEUR, C.D.F.; CARRERE, M. y MANGEMATIN, V. (2004): «Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: The experience of biotech start-ups in France». Research Policy, vol. 33, pp. 631-642.
  • EISENHARDT, K. (1989): «Building theories from case study research». Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, nº 4, pp. 532-550.
  • FISCHER, E.; REUBER, A. y DYKE, L. (1993): «A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender and entrepreneurship». Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 151-68.
  • GARTNER, W. y BIRLEY, S. (2002): «Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research». Journal of Business Venturing, vol.17, pp. 387-395.
  • GUERRERO, M. y URBANO, D. (2011): «The development of an entrepreneurial university». Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x.
  • LOCKETT, A.; WRIGHT, M. y FRANKLIN, S. (2003): «Technology transfer and universities’ spin out strategies». Small Business Economics, vol. 20, pp. 185–203.
  • NOORDENBOS, G. (2002): «Woman in academies of sciences; from exclusion to exception». Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 25, nº 1, pp. 127-137.
  • O’SHEA, R.P.; ALLEN, T.J.; MORSE K.P.; O’GORMAN, C. y ROCHE, F. (2007): «Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience». R & D Management, vol. 37, nº 1, pp. 1-16.
  • ORSER, B.; SPENCE, M.; RIDING, A. y CARRINGTON, C. (2010): «Gender y Export propensity». Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 34, nº 5, pp. 933-958.
  • PADILLA, A.; DEL ÁGUILA, A. y GARRIDO. A. (2010): «Factores determinantes de la transferencia de tecnología en el ámbito universitario. La perspectiva del investigador». Revista Economía Industrial, vol. 378, pp. 91-106.
  • PEÑA, I.; GONZÁLEZ, J.; MARTIARENA, A.; ARANDO, S.; LIZARRALDE, I.; HOYOS, J.; SAIZ, M. y GIBAJA, J. (2010): Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco. Informe Ejecutivo 2009. San Sebastián: EuskoIkaskuntza; Orkestra.
  • ROSA, P. y DAWSON, A. (2006): «Gender and commercialization of university science: academic founders of spinoff companies». Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 18, pp. 341-366.
  • ROTHAERMEL, F.T.; AGUNG, S.D. y JIANG, L. (2007): «University entrepreneurship: Taxonomy of the literature». Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 16, nº 4, pp. 691-791.
  • SHANE, S. (2004): «Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole on university patenting in the United States». Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 19, pp. 127-151.
  • STEPHAN, P.E y EL-GANAINY, A. (2007): «The entrepreneurial puzzle: explaining the gender gap». Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 32, pp. 475-487.
  • THURSBY, J. y THURSBY, M.C. (2005): «Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty». Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 30, pp. 343-353.
  • TUSHMAN, M. y SCANLAN, T. (1981): «Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedent». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 24, pp. 289-305.
  • VOHORA, A.; WRIGHT, M y LOCKETT, A. (2004): «Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies». Research Policy, vol. 33, pp. 147-174.
  • WRIGHT, M.; CLARYSSE, B.; MUSTAR, P. y LOCKETT, A. (2007): Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • YIN, R. (1984).Case study research, design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.