¿Por qué el trabajo duro de una persona funciona como heurístico de su carácter moral?

  1. Conejero López, Susana 1
  2. Pascual Jimeno, Aitziber 1
  3. Etxebarria Bilbao, Itziar 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revue:
EduPsykhé: Revista de psicología y educación

ISSN: 1579-0207

Année de publication: 2022

Volumen: 19

Número: 1

Pages: 128-143

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: EduPsykhé: Revista de psicología y educación

Résumé

People tend to attribute positive moral characteristics to those they perceive as being particularly hard-working. However, empirical evidence indicates that this attribution is premature and unjustified. Everything suggests that the perception of an individual as very hard-working serves as a heuristic, enabling a quick, albeit crude, assessment of their global moral character. The present study analyses the possible origins of this phenomenon and the evidence reported to date and explores possible explanations and theoretical and practical implications. The phenomenon may partly be due to the strong influence of the protestant work ethic that is so dominant in Western society. Although empirical evidence regarding this phenomenon is still scarce, the extant literature clearly supports its presence, at least in the occupational field in the United States. Another possible explanation for this phenomenon may be linked to the availability heuristic, as well as to other closely related phenomena, such as, the illusory correlation and the halo effect. Based on the availability heuristic, an illusory correlation is established between hard work and moral character. For its part, the halo effect contributes to the development of a positive view of the individual in unknown fields, such as the moral one, based on their valuable performance at work. As with other heuristics, the phenomenon analysed here may involve a series of biases. Although, in this case, the judgment made about an individual's moral character based on the heuristic is benevolent, its use may have very harmful effects, both in general and in the moral field. We should consequently be aware of its presence to avoid its possible negative influence.

Références bibliographiques

  • Amos, C., Zhang, L. &Read, D. (2019). Hardworkingas a heuristic for moral character. Why we attribute moral values to those who work hard and its implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1047–1062.doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3725-x
  • Arslan, M. (2001). The work ethic values of protestant British, Catholic Irish and Muslim Turkish managers. Journal of Business Ethics,31(4), 321–339. doi: 10.1023/A:1010787528465
  • Asch, S. E. (1946).Forming impressions of personality.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. doi: 10.1037/h0055756
  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1979). Personal and social components of the protestantethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 109(2), 263–267.doi:10.1080/00224545.1979.9924202
  • Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping.American Psychologist, 58(12), 1019–1027. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019
  • Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K.&Theno, S. A. (1996). Violating Americanvalues: A “value congruence” approach to understandingoutgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,32(4), 387–410. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0018
  • Chapman, L. J. &Chapman, J. P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous diagnosticobservations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72(3), 193–204.
  • Chapman, L. J. &Chapman, J. P. (1969).Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psycho-diagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74(3), 271–80.
  • Cherrington, D. J. (1980). The work ethic: Working values and valuesthat work. Nueva York: Amacom Books.
  • Christopher, A. N., Zabel, K. L.&Jones, J. R. (2008). Conscientiousnessand work ethic ideology: Afacet-level analysis.Journal of Individual Differences, 29(4), 189–198. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.29.4.189
  • Fry, L. W.&Cohen, M. P. (2009). Spiritual leadership as a paradigmfor organizational transformation and recovery from extendedwork hours cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(S2), 265–278. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.29.4.189
  • Furnham, A. (1984). The protestant work ethic: A review of the psychologicalliterature. European Journal of Social Psychology,14(1), 87–104. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420140108Furnham, A. (1990). The Protestant work ethic: The psychology ofwork-related beliefs and behaviors. London: Routledge.
  • Furnham, A.&Quilley, R. (1989). The protestant work ethic and theprisoner’s dilemma game. British Journal of Social Psychology,28(1), 79–87. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00848.x
  • Galperin, B. L.&Burke, R. J. (2006). Uncovering the relationshipbetween workaholism and workplace destructive and constructivedeviance: An exploratory study. The International Journalof Human Resource Management, 17(2), 331–347.doi: 10.1080/09585190500404853
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008b). Decisiones instintivas. La inteligencia del inconsciente. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Hamilton, D. L.&Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons andgroups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336–355. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.336.
  • Iaffaldano, M. T.&Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction andjob performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97,251–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251.
  • Jones, H. B. J. (1997). The protestant ethic: Weber'smodel and theempirical literature. Human Relations, 50(7), 757–778. doi: 10.1023/A:1016960423653.
  • Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensarrápido, pensar despacio.Barcelona: Penguin Random House.
  • Lapsley, D. K. &Hill, P. L. (2008). On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition.Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 313-332. doi: 10.1080/03057240802227486
  • Matute, H. (2019). Nuestra mente nos engaña. Sesgos y errores cognitivos que todos cometemos.Barcelona: Shackletonbooks.
  • Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J.&Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning andmeasurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validationof a multidimensional inventory. Journalof Vocational Behavior,60(3), 451–489. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838.
  • Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity the fatal attraction of truthinessand the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectiveson Psychological Science, 5(2), 163–181. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362351
  • Ostwalt, P. D., Powell, R. P.&Leishman, M. (2011). Profile of a fraudster-who-is-the-typical-fraudster. KPMG.http://www.kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/who-is-the-typical-fraudster.PDF.
  • Parcher, C. (2012). Fraud and the internal auditor: what to do andwhen you find it. Presentado en el2012 ACFE European FraudConference, Londres, UK.http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/european/Course_Materials/2012/2B_Parcher_notes-cpp.pdf.
  • Porter, G. (2010). Work ethic and ethical work: Distortions in theAmerican dream. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 535–550.doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0481-6.
  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Sherman, S. J.&Hamilton, D. L. (1987).Illusory correlation in the perception of individuals andgroups. Social Cognition, 5(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1521/soco.1987.5.1.1
  • Scottl, K. S., Moore, K. S.&Miceli, M. P. (1997). An exploration of themeaning and consequences of workaholism. Human Relations,50(3), 287–314. doi: 10.1177/001872679705000304
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2005).Moral heuristics.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(4), 531–573. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000099
  • Tversky, A. &Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
  • Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., Tannenbaum, D.&Bargh, J. A.(2011). Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Journalof Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.013.
  • Weber, M. (1905/2001). La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo.Madrid: Akal.
  • Zhang, S., Liu, W.&Liu, X. (2012). Investigating the relationshipbetween protestant work ethic and Confuciandynamism: Anempirical test in mainland China. Journal of Business Ethics,106(2), 243–252. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0993-8.
  • Zulfikar, Y. F. (2012). Do Muslims believe more in protestant workethic than Christians? Comparisonof people with different religiousbackground living in the us. Journal of Business Ethics,105(4), 489–502. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0981-z
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008a). Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristics? En W. Sinnott-Armstrong(Ed.),Moral psychology, Vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality:Intuition and diversity.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-26.
La source de données: Dialnet