Relational Antecedents of Innovation in Family FirmsThe Complexity Role of Non-Family Employees' Commitment

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
• Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495-516.
• Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2006). Determinants of how managers cope with organisational downsizing. Applied Psychology, 55(1), 1-26.
• Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73-95.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004). A three component model of customer commitment to service providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 234-250.
• Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., & Feldman, H. D. (2011). Managerial capabilities and paths to growth as determinants of high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 29(6), 671-694.
• Barnett, T., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? nonfamily employees' perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837-853.
• Basco, R., & Voordeckers, W. (2015). The relationship between the board of directors and firm performance in private family firms: A test of the demographic versus behavioral approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(4), 411-435.
• Bergman, M. E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: Review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 645-663.
• Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction, and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39-61.
• Block, J. (2011). How to pay nonfamily managers in large family firms: A principal-agent model. Family Business Review, 24(1), 9-27.
• Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677-686.
• Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product market entry. Administrative Science Quartely, 42(1), 231-236.
• Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., Grunebaum, J., & Ulrich, D. (1991). Contextual therapy. In A. S. Gurman, & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 200-238). New York: Brunner.
• Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy Management Journal, 47(1), 795-817.
• Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quartely, 19(4), 533-546.
• Cabrera-Suarez, M. K., Deniz-Deniz, M. C., & Martin-Santana, J. D. (2015). Family social capital, trust within the TMT, and the establishment of corporate goals related to nonfamily stakeholders. Family Business Review, 28(2), 145-162.
• Camelo-Ordaz, C., Garcia-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in spain: The mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1442-1463.
• Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 585-608.
• Carnes, C. M., & Ireland, R. D. (2013). Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1399-1419.
• Carrasco-Hernandez, A., & Jimenez-Jimenez, D. (2013). Can family firms innovate? sharing internal knowledge from a social capital perspective. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 30-37.
• Chen, H., & Hsu, W. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347-362.
• Chen, M., Chang, Y., & Hung, S. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38(1), 21-33.
• Chirico, F., & Salvato, C. (2016). Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matters. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 201-229.
• Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
• Coff, R., & Rousseau, D. J. V. I. (2000). Sustainable competitive advantage from relational wealth. In C. R. Leana, & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Relational wealth: The advantages of stability in a changing economy (pp. 27-48). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S), S95-S120.
• Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on "comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence". Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , 355-362.
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewarship theory and management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
• Dawson, A., Sharma, P., Irving, P. G., Marcus, J., & Chirico, F. (2015). Predictors of later-generation family members' commitment to family enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 545-569.
• De Massis, A., Audretsch, D. B., Uhlaner, L. M., & Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons form the german mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125-146.
• Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264.
• Dyer Jr., W. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401-406.
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
• García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19(4), 299-319.
• Gedajlovic, E. R., Honig, B., Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455-478.
• Gellatly, I. R., Meyer, J. P., & Luchak, A. A. (2006). Combined effects of the three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviors: A test of meyer and herscovitch's propositions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 331-345.
• Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
• Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden, & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 201-233). Beverly Hills: Sage.
• Hackett, R. D., Bycio, P., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1994). Further assessments of meyer and allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 15-23.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 1-17.
• Handler, W. C. (1992). The succession experience of next-generation. Family Business Review, 5(3), 283-307.
• Hansen, M. T., Poldony, J. M., & Pfeffer, J. (2001). So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 18(1), 21-57.
• Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? meta-analytic comparisons of integretive behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy Management Journal, 49(2), 305-325.
• Hatak, I., Kautonen, T., Fink, M., & Kansikas, J. (2016). Innovativeness and family-firm performance: The moderating effect of family commitment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102(1), 120-131.
• Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., . . . Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: Comments on rönkkö & evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
• Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474-487.
• Hislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: A review and research agenda. Employee Relations, 25(2), 182-202.
• Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2003). When a teamwork really matters: Task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamwork performance relationship in software development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(4), 281-302.
• House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(4), 81-97.
• Howorth, C., Rose, M. B., Hamilton, E., & Westhead, P. (2010). Family firm diversity and development: An introduction. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 437-451.
• Huy, Q. N., Corley, K. G., & Kraatz, M. S. (2014). From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1650-1680.
• Iverson, R. D. (1996). Employee acceptance of organizational change: The role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1), 122-149. Johnson, L. K. (2005). The new loyalty: Make it work for your company. Harvard Management Update, 10(3), 3-5.
• Johnson, R. E., & Yang, L. Q. (2010). Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Academy Management Review, 35(2), 226-245. Jones, T., & Taylor, S. F. (2007). The nature and dimensionality of service loyalty: How many dimensions? Journal of Services Marketing, 27(1), 36-51.
• Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of famiy controlled firms: The good news and the bad news. Organisational Dynamics, 21(3), 59-71.
• Ko, J. W., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Assessment of meyer and allen's three-component model of organizational commitment in south korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 961-972.
• Kuvaas, B.,. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 365-385.
• Kwon, S., & Adler, P. S. (2014). Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Academy Management Review, 39(4), 412-422.
• Lapointe, E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2017). Supervisory mentoring and affective commitment and turnover: The critical role of contextual factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98(1), 98-107. Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
• Lin, C. O., Tsai, Y. H., & Chiu, C. K. (2009). Modeling customer loyalty form an integrative perspective of self-determination theory and expectation-confirmation theory. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 315-326.
• Loi, R., Hang-Yue, N., & Foley, S. (2006). Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intetion to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(1), 101-120.
• Luchak, A. A., & Gellatly, I. R. (2007). A comparison of linear and nonlinear relations between organizational commitment and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 786-793. Lumpkin, G. T., Martin, W., & Vaughn, M. (2008). Family orientation: Individual-level influences on family firm outcomes. Family Business Review, 21(2), 127-138.
• Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., Von Krogh, G., & Mueller, J. (2011). Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation knowledge, and knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 296-310.
• Maurer, I., Bartsch, V., & Ebers, M. (2011). The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies, 32(2), 157-185.
• Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quartely, 51(2), 262-292.
• McGee, G. W., & Ford, R. C. (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 638-641.
• Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 321-333.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management, 1(1), 61-89.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
• Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Towad an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665-683.
• Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299-326.
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235.
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829-858.
• Miller, D., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 553-571.
• Miller, D., Wright, M., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholes, L. (2015). Resources and innovation in family business. California Management Review, 58(1), 20-40.
• Miller, D., Xu, X., & Mehrotra, V. (2015). When is human capital a valuable resource? the perfromance effects of ivy league selection among celebrated CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 930-944.
• Molly, V., Laveren, E., & Deloof, M. (2010). Family business succession and its impact on financial structure and performance. Family Business Review, 23(2), 131-147.
• Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129-1151.
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
• Niehm, L. S., Swinney, J., & Miller, N. J. (2008). Community social responsibility and its consequences for family business performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 331-350. Nielsen, B. B. (2005). The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Venturing, 58(9), 1194-1204.
• Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1031-1056.
• Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1849-1864.
• Oh, H., Chung, M. H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy Management Journal, 47(5), 860-875.
• Oppenheim, A. N. (1966). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement Basic Books.
• Patel, P. C., & Fiet, J. O. (2011). Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 35(6), 1179-1197.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and procedures. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
• Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
• Qureshi, I., & Compeau, D. (2009). Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: A comparison of covariance-and component-based SEM. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 197-214.
• Ram, M. (2001). Family dynamics in a small consultancy firm: A case study. Human Relations, 54(4), 395-418.
• Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Roldan, J. L., Jaafar, M., & Ramayah, T. (2017). Factors influencing residents' perceptions toward tourism development: Diferences across rural and urban world heritage sites. Journal of Travel Research, 56(6), 760-775.
• Reiss, D., & Olivery, M. E. (1991). The family's conception of accountability and competence: A new apporach to the conceptualization and assessment of family stress. Family Process, 30(2), 193-214.
• Röd, I. (2016). Disentangling the family firm's innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 185-201.
• Roldan, J. L., & Sanchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, A. Gelman, A. Steenkamp & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193-221). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
• Ruekert, R. W., & Walker Jr, O. C. (1987). Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 1-19.
• Sanchez-Famoso, V., Akhter, N., Iturralde, T., Chirico, F., & Maseda, A. (2015). Is non-family social capital also (or especially) important for family firm performance? Human Relations, 68(11), 1713-1743.
• Sanchez-Famoso, V., Maseda, A., & Iturralde, T. (2014). The role of internal social capital in organisational innovation. an empirical study of family firms. European Management Journal, 32(6), 950-962.
• Sanchez-Famoso, V., Maseda, A., & Iturralde, T. (2017). Family involvement in top management team: Impact on relationships between internal social capital and innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(1), 136-162.
• Sanchez-Famoso, V., Pittino, D., Chirico, F., Maseda, A., & Iturralde, T. (2019). Social capital and innovation in family firms. the moderating roles of family control and generational involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 1-13.
• Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., Giacosa, E., & Giovando, G. (2018). How SMEs engage in open innovation: A survey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 561-574.
• Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Measurement and research methods in international marketing (pp. 195-218). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Jersey: Harvard Economic Studies. Sharma, P., & Irving, P. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 13-33.
• Sieger, P., Bernhard, F., & Frey, U. (2011). Affective commitment and job satisfaction among non-family employees: Investigating the roles of justice perceptions and psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(2), 78-89.
• Solinger, O. N., Olffen, W., & Roe, R. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 70-83.
• Sonfield, M. C., & Lussier, R. N. (2009). Non-family-members in the family business management team: A multinational investigation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 395-415.
• Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Rost, K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907-918.
• Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
• Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quartely, 42(1), 35-67.
• Vallejo-Martos, M. C. (2009). The effects of commitment of non-family employees of family firms from the perspective of stewardship theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 379-390.
• Vallejo-Martos, M. C., & Puentes-Poyatos, R. (2014). Family firms as incubators for ethical behavior: An exploratory study from the perspective of stewardship theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(6), 784-807.
• Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Administrative Science Quartely, 29(1), 74-92.
• Werbel, J. D., & Danes, S. M. (2010). Work family conflict in new business ventures: The moderating effects of spousal commitment to the new business venture. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3), 421-440.
• Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2007). 'Types' of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 19(5), 405-431.
• Williams, J., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(1), 23-51.
• Wise, S. (2014). Can a team have too much cohesion? the dark side of network density. European Management Journal, 32(5), 703-711.
• Yan, Z., Wang, X., & Su, C. (2006). A review of research methodologies in international business. International Business Review, 15(6), 601-617.
• Yildirim-Öktem, Ö., & Üsdiken, B. (2010). Contingencies versus external pressure: Professionalization in boards of frms affiliated to family business groups in late-industrializing countries. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 115-130.
• Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363-381.
• Zwick, G. A., & Jurinski, J. J. (1999). Tax and financial planning for the closey held family businesses. New York: Cambridge University Press.