Repercusión de la Triple Helix y las Dificultades para Innovar en los Objetivos de InnovaciónEspaña, 2007-2013

Références bibliographiques

• AGHION, P., & HOWITT, P. (1992): “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-361.
• ARUNDEL, A. (1997): “Enterprise strategies and barriers to innovation”. En A. Arundel, R. Garrelfs, & E. Comosion (Ed.), Innovation measurement and policies (págs. 101-108). EIMS publications.
• AUDRETSCHE, D., & KEILBACH, M. (2007): “The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship”. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242-1254.
• BAGOZZI, R., & YI, Y. (1988): “On the evaluation of structural equation models”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1(16), 74-94.
• BALDWIN, J., & LIN, Z. (2002): “Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufactures”. Research Policy, 31, 1-18.
• BECERRA, M., LUNNAN, R., & HUEMER, L. (2008): “Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners·. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 691-713.
• BELDERBOS, R., CARREE, M., & LOKSHIN, B. (2004): “Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance”. Research Policy, 33, 1477–1492.
• BENTLER, P. M. (1990): “Comparative fit indexes in structural models”. Psychological Bulletin(107), 238-246.
• BIANCHINI, S., LISSONI, F., PEZZONI, M., & ZIRULIA, L. (2016): “The economics of research, consulting, and teaching quality: theory and evidence from a technical university”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(7), 668-691.
• CARAYANNIS, E., & CAMPBELL, D. (2009): Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and use in Innovation Networks and Knowldege Clusters: a Comparative Systems Approach Acrosso the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport: Praeger.
• CAVALLINI, S., SOLDI, R., FRIEDL, J., & VOLPE, M. (2016): Using the Quadruple Helix Approach to Accelerate the Transfer of Research and Innovation Results to Regional Growth. Brussels: European Union Committee of the Regions.
• CHESBROUGH, H. (2003): Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
• COMMISSION EUROPEAN (2010): Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: COM/2010/2020 final.
• DAHEIM, C., & UERZ, G. (2008): Corporate foresight in europe: From trend based logics to open foresight. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 321-336.
• DAMANPOUR, F. (1991): “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”. Academy of Management Journal, I, 555-590.
• DAMANPOUR, F., & GOPALAKRISHNAN, S. (1998): “Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 1-17.
• DODGSON, M. (2014): “Collaboration and innovation management”. En Dodgson, M., D. Gann, & N. Phillips, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• DUNCAN, R. B. (1972): “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313-327.
• EDQUIST, C., LUUKKONEN, T., & SOTARAUTA, M. (2009): Broad-Based Innovation Policy, Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System. Helsinki: Taloustieto Ltd.
• ETZKORWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
• ETZKOWITZ, H. (2002): “Networks of innovation: Science, technology and development in the triple helix era”. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 7-20.
• ETZKOWITZ, H. (2008): The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
• ETZKOWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998): “The endless transition: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”. Minerva, 36, 203-208.
• FITJAR, R., GJELSVIK, M., & RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. (2014): “Organizing product innovation: hierarchy, market”. The Triple Helix, 1(3), 1-21.
• FREEL, M. (1998): “Evolution, Innovation and Learning: evidence from Case Studies”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Journal, 10(2), 137-149.
• GALIA, F., & LEGROS, D. (2004): “Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France”. Research Policy, 33, 1185-1199.
• GARCÍA, D., & MARTÍNEZ, M. (2009): Innovación y Cultura Empresarial de las MIPYME (1 ed.). Aguascalientes, México: Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes y Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena.
• GAZDA, E., & QUANDT, C. O. (2010): “Colaboração Interinstitucional em Pesquisa no Brasil: Tendências em Artigos na area de Gestão da Inovação”. RAE, 9(2), 1-27.
• GILL, J., & JOHNSON, P. (2010): Research methods for managers (4 ed.). Londres: Sage Publications.
• GROSSMAN, G., & HELPMAN, E. (1993): Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• HAGEDOORN, J., LINK, A., & VONORTAS, N. (2000): “Research partnerships”. Research Policy, 29, 567-586.
• HAIR, J. F., ANDERSON, R. E., TATHAM, R., & BLACK, W. (1995): Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• HARGADON, A., & DOUGLAS, Y. (2001): “When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476-501.
• HERNÁNDEZ-ESPALLARDO, M., & DELGADO-BALLESTER, E. (2009): “Product innovation in small manufacturers, market orientation and the industry’s five competitive forces: Empirical evidence from Spain”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(4), 470-491.
• HERRERA, H. (2009): “Investigación sobre redes sociales y emprendimiento: revisión de la literatura y agenda futura”. Innovar, 33, 19-34.
• HU, L., & BENTLER, P. (1999): “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
• KOSACOF, B., & LÓPEZ, A. (2000): “Los cambios organizacionales y tecnológicos en las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Repensando el estilo de desarrollo argentino”. Revista de la Escuela de Economía y Negocios, 2(abril), 37-70.
• LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001): “Developing Innovation Capability in Organization”. International Journal of Innovation Managemente, 5(3), 1-23.
• LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovation”. Research Policy, 29, 243-256.
• LEYDESDORFF, L. (2012): “The Triple-Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?” . Journal of the Kwoledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35.
• LEYDESDORFF, L., DOLFSMA, W., & VAN DER PANNE, G. (2006): “Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of Triple Helix relations among technology, organization, and territory”. Research Policy, 35, 181-199.
• LÖÖF, H., & BROSTROM, A. (2008): “Does knowledge diffusion between universities and ndustry increase innovativeness?” Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 73-90.
• LÓPEZ, A., & LUGONES, G. (1998): “Los tejidos locales ante la globalizacion del cambio tecnológico”. Revista Redes, 12, 13-44.
• MESQUITA, L. E., & LAZZARINI, S. G. (2008): “Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: Implications for SMEs’ access to global markets”. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 359-380.
• MIOZZO, M., & DEWICK, P. (2004): “Networks and innovation in European construction:benefits from interorganisational cooperation in a fragmented industry”. International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 68-92.
• MIRAVITLLES MATAMOROS, P., GUITART TARRÉS, L., ACHCAOUCAOU IALLOUCHEN, F., & NÚNEZ CARBALLOSA, A. (2012): “El papel del entorno en la localización de actividades de I+D en las filiales de multinacionales extranjeras”. Revista Europea de Direccón y Economía de la Empresa, 21(2), 169-181.
• MOHEN, P., & ROLLER, L. (2005): “Complementarities in innovation policy”. European Economie Review, 24, 1431-1450.
• MOHEN, P., & ROSA, J. (2000): Les obstacles à l’innovation dans les industries de services au Canada. Montreal: CIRANO Scientific Series.
• MOHNEN, P., MAIRESSE, J., & DAGENAIS, M. (2006): Innovativity: a comparison across seven European countries. Cambridge: NBER Working Paper Series.
• MONJON, S., & WALBROECK, P. (2003): “Assessing spillovers from universities to firms:evidence from French firm-level data”. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1255–1270.
• NELSON, R., & WINTER, S. (1977): “In search of a useful innovation theory”. Research Policy, 6, 36-76.
• NIETO, M., & SANTAMARIA, L. (2007): “The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation”. Technovation, 27, 367–377.
• NORTH, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• PERKMANN, M., & WALSH, K. (2007). “University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda”. International journal of management reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
• PIATIER, A. (1984): Barriers to Innovation. London: Frances Printer.
• POWELL, W., WHITE, D., KOPUT, K., & OWEN-SMITH, J. (2005): “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences”. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 132–1205.
• RADAS, S., & BOŽIć, L. (2009): “The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy”. Technovation, 29(6-7), 438-450.
• ROBIN, S., & SCHUBER, T. (2013): “Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany”. Research Policy, 42, 149-166.
• ROMER, P. (1990): !Endogenous technological change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 72-10.
• ROPER, S., DU, J., & LOVE, J. (2008): “Modeling the innovation value chain”. Research Policy, 37, 961-977.
• RUIZ, M., PARDO, A., & SAN MARTIN, R. (2010): “Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales”. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
• SAGUY, S. (2011): “Academia-industry innovation interaction: paradigm shifts and avenues for the future”. Procedia Food Science, 1, 1875-1882.
• SAVIGNAC, F. (2006): “The impact of financial constraints on innovation: evidence from French manufacturing firms”. Cahiers de la MSE, 42.
• SCHMOCH, U., & SCHUBERT, T. (2009): “Sustainability of incentives for excellent research – the German case”. Scientometrics, 81, 195-218.
• SHAZIA, A., AMAT, S., & ARSLAN, U. (2015): “Organization Culture and Open Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Open Innovation Model Approach”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (Special Issue), 335-342.
• THOMÄ, J., & ZIMMERMANN, V. (2016): “Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung”. Innovationshemmnisse in KMU. Eine empirische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung des Handwerks (6), 1-20.
• TIWARI, A., MOHNEN, P., PALM, F., & VAN DER LOEFF, S. (2007): “Financial constraint and R&D Investment: Evidence from CIS”. United Nations University-MERIT, Working Paper Series (11).
• TOURIGNY, D., & LE, C. (2004): “Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(3), 217-250.
• VARGAS, J., MARTÍNEZ, M., & MOJICA, E. (2011): “Influencia de la Orientación al Mercado y la Innovación en la Internacionalización y el Desempeño de las PYMES en el Estado de Aguascalientes”. Revista de Micro e Pequena Empresa, 5(1), 120-133.
• VASCONCELOS VALE, G., WILKINSON, J., & AMÂNCIO, R. (2008): “Empreendedorismo, inovaçao e redes: Uma nova abordagem”. RAE-Revista de Administraçao de Empresas, 7(1), art. 7, 1-16.
• WILLIAMS, L., COTE, J., & BUCKLEY, M. R. (1989): “Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artefact?” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462.468.
• ZIMMERMANN, V. (2012): “Barriers to innovation in SMEs”. KfW Economic Research, 6(6). http://www.kfw.de/ kfw/en/I/II/Download_Center/Research/Fokus_PDF-Datein/Fokus_Nr__6_EN_2012.pdf.
• ZIMMERMANN, V. (2015): “Innovationsfinanzierung. Herausforderung für mittelständische Unternehmen”. Corporate Finance (6), 183-190.