'Whenever a man takes you to lunch around here'Tracing post-feminist sensibility in Mad Men
ISSN: 1757-1898
Année de publication: 2012
Volumen: 4
Número: 2
Pages: 155-170
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies
Résumé
This article argues that a post-feminist spirit underlies the representation of the successful television series Mad Men (AMC 2007–). Set in the flourishing New York advertising industry during the early 1960s, Mad Men depicts the rapid changes experienced in gender identities and cross-gender relationships in both the public and private spheres. This article contends that a post-feminist sensibility – a term proposed by Rosalind Gill – can be felt at different levels as the fiction develops. First, it permits self-indulgence in the viewer: the time set justifies the depiction of blatant sexism and at the same time imposes a lapse so wide that feminist awakening can be simultaneously viewed as urgent in the 1960s and as a victory already achieved. Second, it inspires nostalgia and venerates pre-feminist glamour and straightforwardness. Finally, a post-feminist spirit imbues the representation of female characters but, most notably, plays a crucial role in the depiction of men, particularly the protagonist Donald Draper.
Références bibliographiques
- Adriaens, F. (2009), ‘Postfeminism in popular culture: A potential for criti- cal resistance?’, Politics and Culture, 4. http://www.politicsandculture. org/2009/11/09/ post-feminism-in-popular-culture-a-potential-for- critical-resistance/ Accesed 2 February, 2011.
- Agirre, K, (2012), ‘“Whenever a man takes you to lunch around here”: Tracing post-feminist sensibility in Mad Men’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 4: 2, pp. 155–170, doi: 10.1386/cjcs.4.2.155_1
- Ally McBeal, FOX, 1997–2002.
- Blake, M. (2010), ‘“Mad Men” recap: “I would have my secretary do it, but she’s dead”’, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2010/09/ mad-men-recap-i-would-have-my-secretary-do-it-but-shes-dead.html. Accessed 10 May 2011.
- Bolonik, K. (2009), ‘Mad Men’s Elisabeth Moss on Peggy Olson, the ultimate feminist’ http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/10/elizabeth_moss_ isnt_a_ mad_ man .html. Accessed 10 December 2011.
- Brooks, A. (1997), Post Feminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory and Cultural Forms, London and New York: Routledge.
- Byers, T. B. (1996), ‘History re-membered: Forrest Gump, post-feminist masculinity, and the burial of the counterculture’, Modern Fiction Studie, 42: 2, pp. 419–40.
- Cartmell, D., Hunter, I. Q. and Whelehan, I. (eds) (2001), Retrovision: Reinventing the Past in Film and Fiction, London: Pluto Press.
- Cohan, S. and Hark, I. R. (eds) (1993), Screening the Male: Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema, London and New York: Routledge.
- Cook, P. (2005), Screening the Past. Memory and Nostalgia in Cinema, London and New York: Routledge.
- Coontz, S. (2010), ‘Why “Mad Men” is TV’s most feminist show’, The Washington Post, 10 October. p. 40.
- Desperate housewives, ABC, 2004–2012, TV series.
- Dow, B. J. (2006), ‘The traffic in men: Fatal attraction, post-feminist mascu- linity, and 1980s media’, Women’s Studies in Communication, 29, Spring, pp. 113–31.
- Doyle, S. (2010), ‘Mad men’s very modern sexism problem’, The Atlantic, 2 August. pp. 9.
- Dyer, R. (2007), Pastiche, London: Routledge.
- Edgerton, G. (2011), Mad Men. Dream Come True TV, London: I.B. Tauris.
- Engoron, E. (2010), ‘Why mad men is bad for women’, http://www.salon. com/2010/07 /23/mad men_bad_for_women/. Accessed 27 October 2011.
- Faludi, S. (1992), Backlash: The Undeclared War against Women, London: Vintage.
- Gill, R (2007), ‘Post-feminism media culture. Elements of a sensibility’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10: 2, pp. 147–66.
- Goodlad, L. (2009), ‘Why we love mad men’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 31, August, p. 13.
- Greif, M. (2008), ‘You’ll love the way it makes you feel’, London Review of Books, 30: 20, 23 October, pp. 15–16.
- Hamad, H. (2009), ‘DAD TV – Postfeminism and the paternalization of US television drama’, Flow TV, 11: 2
- Haralovich, M.B. (2011), ‘Women on the Verge of the Second Wave: At Home and At Work in Mad Men’ in Gary R. Edgerton (ed.), Mad Men: Dream Come True TV, London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 159–175.
- Hill, L. (2009), ‘Dangerous curves‘, http://nymag.com/arts/tv/profiles/58170/. Accessed 1 November 2011.
- Hollows, J. and Moseley R. (eds) (2006), Feminism in Popular Culture, New York: Berg.
- Hutcheon, L. (1988), A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory, Fiction, New York and London: Routledge.
- Jameson, F. (1991), Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Jeffords, S. (1993), Hard Bodies: Hollywood Masculinity in the Reagan Era, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Kirkham, P. and Thumim, J. (eds) (1993), You Tarzan: Masculinity, Movies and Men, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
- McLean, G. (2008). ‘Is Mad Men misogynistic?’, The Guardian blog, 21 May.
- McRobbie, A. (2004), ‘Postfeminism and popular culture’, Feminist Media Studies, 4: 3, pp. 255–64.
- McRobbie, A. (2009), The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change, London: Sage.
- Mittell, J. (2010), ‘On disliking Mad Men’, http://justtv.wordpress. com/2010/07/29/on-disliking-mad-men/. Accessed 1 April 2011.
- Moseley, R. (2000), ‘Makeover takeover on British television’, Screen, 41: 3, pp. 299–314.
- Peberdy, D. (2010), ‘From wimps to wild men: Bipolar masculinity and the paradoxical performances of Tom Cruise’, Men & Masculinities Journal, 13: 2, pp. 231–54.
- Sex and the City, HBO, 1998-2004.
- Tasker, Y. and Negra, D. (2005), ‘In focus: Post feminism and contemporary media studies’, Cinema Journal, 44: 2, pp. 107–10.
- Tasker, Y. and Negra, D. (2007), Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, Durham: Duke University Press.
- Whelehan, I. (2000), Overloaded: Popular Culture and the Future of Feminism, London: Women’s Press.
- White, M. (2011), ‘Mad Women’ in in Gary R. Edgerton(ed.), Mad Men: Dream Come True TV, London: I.B. Taurus, pp. 147–58.