Un balance de los giros empírico, sistémico y retórico de la Teoría Deliberativa

  1. Engelken Jorge, Marcos
Revue:
RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

ISSN: 1577-239X

Année de publication: 2012

Volumen: 11

Número: 4

Pages: 13-30

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

Résumé

En este trabajo se ofrecerá un balance del giro empírico de la teoría deliberativa. Se sostendrá que el mismo (a) aporta abundante evidencia empírica tendente a demostrar las potencialidades de la deliberación pública; (b) pone de relieve el gran número de factores que condicionan tales procesos de deliberación y (c) subraya las divergentes condiciones que favorecen la satisfacción de determinadas expectativas normativas asociadas al ideal de democracia deliberativa. Esta última observación ha insuflado un renovado impulso a las aproximaciones sistémicas y retóricas a la deliberación. En la segunda parte de este trabajo, se las caracterizará brevemente, expondrá su mutua complementariedad e identificarán sus actuales déficits y retos.

Références bibliographiques

  • ACKERMAN, Bruce y FISHKIN, James S. (2004): Deliberation Day. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • AGUIAR, Fernando y NAVARRO, Clemente J. (2000): “Democracia y Participación Ciudadana en los Municipios: ¿Un Mercado Político de Trastos?”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 91: 89-111.
  • ALBRECHT, Steffen (2006): “Whose Voice Is Heard in Online Deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet”, Information, Communication & Society, 9(1): 62-82.
  • BÄCHTIGER, André y HANGARTNER, Dominik (2010): “When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation”, Political Studies, 58(4): 609-629.
  • BÄCHTIGER, André; NIEMEYER, Simon; NEBLO, Michael; STEENBERGEN, Marco R. y STEINER, Jürg (2010): “Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1): 32-63.
  • BÄCHTIGER, André, SPÖRNDLI, Markus; STEENBERGEN, Marco R. y STEINER, Jürg (2005): “The Deliberative Dimensions of Legislatures”, Acta Politica, 40(2): 225-238.
  • BÄCHTIGER, André; STEENBERGEN, Marco R. y NIEMEYER, Simon (2007): “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction”, Swiss Political Science Review, 13(4): 485-496.
  • BÄCHTIGER, André; SHIKANO, Susumu; PEDRINI, Seraina y RYSER, Mirjam (2010): “Measuring Deliberation 2.0: Standards, Discourse Types, and Sequenzialization”, paper presentado en el Democracy Seminar Series del Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School, febrero de 2010. Disponible en http://ash.harvard.edu/extension/ash/docs/ baechtiger.pdf
  • BAIOCCHI, Gianpaolo (2001): “Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory”, Politics & Society, 29(1): 43-72.
  • BENSON, Rodney (2009): “Shaping the Public Sphere: Habermas and Beyond”, The American Sociologist, 40: 175-197.
  • BLANCO, Ismael y GOMÀ, Ricard (coords., 2002): Gobiernos Locales y Redes Participativas, Barcelona: Ariel.
  • CHAMBERS, Simone (2009): “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?”, Political Theory, 37(3): 323-350.
  • COHEN, Joshua y FUNG, Archon (2004): “Radical Democracy”, Swiss Political Science Review, 10(4): 169-180.
  • DAHLBERG, Lincoln (2001): “The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere”, Information, Communication & Society, 4(4): 615-633.
  • DAHLGREN, Peter (2005): “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation”, Political Communication, 22(2): 147-162.
  • DELLI CARPINI, Michael X.; COOK, Fay Lomaz y JACOBS, Lawrence R. (2004): “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature”, Annual Review of Political Science, 7: 315- 344.
  • DRUCKMAN, James N. (2004): “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects”, American Political Science Review, 98(4): 671-686.
  • DRYZEK, John S. (2001): “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy”, Political Theory, 29(5): 651-669.
  • DRYZEK, John S. (2010): “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation”, Political Theory, 38(3): 319-339.
  • DRYZEK, John S. (2010b): “Deliberative Turns”, en J.S. Dryzek, Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance, Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
  • ELSTUB, Stephen (2011): “Deliberative Pragmatic Equilibrium Review”, ponencia presentada en la VI ECPR General Conference, Reikiavik, agosto 2011.
  • FISHKIN, James y LUSKIN, Robert C. (2000): “The Quest for Deliberative Democracy”, en M. Saward (ed.), Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association, London: Routledge, 17-27.
  • FISHKIN, James y LUSKIN, Robert C (2005): “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion”, Acta Politica, 40(3): 284-298.
  • FISHKIN, James y LUSKIN, Robert C (2012): “Deliberative Polling: Reflections on an Ideal Made Practical”, en B. Geissel y K. Newton (eds.), Evaluating Democratic Innovations, Oxon: Routledge.
  • FISHKIN, James S.; LUSKIN, Robert C.; O’FLYNN, Ian y RUSSELL, David (2009): “Deliberating across Deep Divides”, comunicación presentada en la 5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam, septiembre de 2009.
  • FONT, Joan y BLANCO, Ismael (2001): “Conclusiones”, en J. Font (ed.), Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas, Barcelona: Ariel.
  • FUNG, Archon (2003): “Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3): 338-367.
  • FUNG, Archon (2004): Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • FUNG, Archon (2006): “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance”, Public Administration Review, 66(1): 66-75.
  • FUNG, Archon y WRIGHT, Erik Olin (2001): “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance”, Politics & Society, 29(1): 5-41.
  • GANUZA, Ernesto; FRANCÉS, Francisco; LAFUENTE, Regina y GARRIDO, Fernando (2012): “¿Cambian sus preferencias los participantes en la deliberación?, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 139: 111-132.
  • GARSTEN, Bryan (2006): Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgement, Cambridge/ London: Harvard University Press.
  • GARSTEN, Bryan (2011): “The Rhetoric Revival in Political Theory”, Annual Review of Political Science, 14:159-180.
  • GERHARDS, Jürgen (1997): “Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit. Eine empirische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 49(1): 1-34.
  • GERHARDS, Jürgen, NEIDHARDT, Friedhelm y RUCHT, Dieter (1998): Zwischen Palaver und Diskurs: Structuren Öffentlicher Meinungbildung am Beispiel der Deutschen Diskussion zur Abtreibung, Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • GOMÀ, Ricard y REBOLLO, Óscar (2001): “Democracia local y ciudadanía activa: reflexiones en torno a los presupuestos participativos”, en J. Font (coord.), Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas, Barcelona: Ariel, 201-2017.
  • GOODIN, Robert E. (2005): “Sequencing Deliberative Moments”, Acta Politica, 40(2): 182-196.
  • GOODIN, Robert E. y DRYZEK, John S. (2006): “Deliberative Impacts: The MacroPolitical Uptake of Mini-Publics”, Politics & Society, 34(2): 219-244.
  • GRÖNLUND, Kimmo, SETÄLÄ, Maija y HERNE, Kaisa (2010): “Deliberation and civic virtue: lessons from a citizen deliberation experiment”, European Political Science Review, 2(1): 95-117.
  • HABERMAS, Jürgen (1992): Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1994 (4ª ed.).
  • HABERMAS, Jürgen (2005): “Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics”, Acta Politica, 40(3): 384-392.
  • HABERMAS, Jürgen (2008): “Hat die Demokratie noch eine epistemische Dimension? Empirische Forschung und normative Theorie”, en J. Habermas, Ach, Europa, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • HENDRIKS, Carolyn M. (2006): “Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual role in Deliberative Democracy”, Political Studies, 54(3): 486-508.
  • HENDRIKS, Carolyn M.; DRYZEK, John S. y HUNOLD, Christian (2007): “Turning Up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation”, Political Studies, 55(2): 362-383.
  • JORBA GALDÓS, Laia (2009): Deliberación y preferencias ciudadanas: un enfoque empírico. La experiencia de Córdoba, Madrid: CIS.
  • KRAUSE, Sharon (2008): Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Landwehr, Claudia y Katharina Holzinger (2010): “Institutional Determinants of Deliberative Interaction”, European Political Science Review, 2(3): 373-400.
  • IBARRA GÜELL, Pedro (2008): Relational Democracy. Reno: Center for Basque Studies.
  • LANG, Amy y WARREN, Mark E. (2011): “Supplementary Democracy? Democratic Deficits and Citizens’ Assemblies”, paper presentado en Matchpoints Seminar 2011, Aarhus, mayo 2011.
  • LOWNDES, Vivien; LAWRENCE, Pratchett y STOKER, Gerry (2001): “Trends in Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives”, Public Administration, 79(1): 205-222.
  • MAIZ, Ramón (2011): “The Political Mind and Its Other: Rethinking the Non-Place of Passions in Modern Political Theory”, en M. Engelken-Jorge, P. Ibarra Güell y C. Moreno del Río (eds.), Politics and Emotions: The Obama Phenomenon, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
  • MANSBRIDGE, Jane (1999): “Everyday talk in the deliberative system”, en S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • MENDELBERG, Tai (2002): “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence”, en M.X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy y R.Y. Shapiro (eds.), Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation: Research in Micropolitics, Volume 6, New York: Elsevier Science, 151-193.
  • MORRELL, Michael E. (2010): Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking, and Deliberation, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • MUTZ, Diana C. (2002): “Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice”, American Political Science Review, 96(1): 111-126.
  • NEBLO, Michael A. (2005): “Thinking through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics”, Acta Politica, 40(2): 169-181.
  • NEBLO, Michael A.; ESTERLING, Kevin M.; KENNEDY, Ryan P.; LAZER, David M.J. y SOKHEY, Anand E. (2010): “Who Wants to Deliberate—And Why?”, American Political Science Review, 104(3): 566-583.
  • NIEMEYER, Simon (2011): “The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics”, Politics & Society, 39(1): 103-140.
  • PARKINSON, John (2003): “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy”, Political Studies, 51(1): 180-196.
  • PILON, Dennis (2009): “Investigating Media as a Deliberative Space: Newspaper Opinions about Voting Systems in the 2007 Ontario Provincial Referendum”, Canadian Political Science Review, 3(3): 1-23.
  • ROHLINGER, Deana A. (2007): “American Media and Deliberative Democratic Processes”, Sociological Theory, 25(2): 122-148.
  • SÆBØ, Øystein; ROSE, Jeremy y FLAK, Leif Skiftenes (2008): “The shape of eParticipation: Charaterizing an emerging research area”, Government Information Quartely, 25(3): 400-428.
  • SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa (1998): “Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy”, Politics & Society, 26(4): 461-510.
  • SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa (1999): “Reinventar la democracia”, en Boaventura de Sousa Santos, El Milenio Huérfano. Ensayos para una nueva cultura, Madrid: Trotta. 2005.
  • SEARING, Donald D; SOLT, Frederick; CONOVER, Pamela Johnston y CREWE, Ivor (2007): “Public Discussion in the Deliberative System: Does It Make Better Citizens?”, British Journal of Political Science, 37(4): 587-618.
  • SMITH, Graham (2009): Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • STEENBERGEN, Marco R; BÄCHTIGER, André; SPÖRNDLI, Markus y STEINER, Jürg (2003): “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index”, Comparative European Politics, 1(1): 21-48.
  • STEINER, Jürg (2008): “Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation”, European Political Science, 7(2): 186-190.
  • STRYDOM, Piet (2001): “The Problem of Triple Contingency in Habermas”, Sociological Theory, 19(2): 165 – 186.
  • TALPIN, Julien y WOJCIK, Stéphanie (2009): “The Politics of Presence: The Effects of Online vs. FacetoFace Deliberation”, ponencia presentada en el 21st World Congress, International Political Science Association, Santiago de Chile, julio de 2009.
  • TRENZ, Hans-Jörg y EDER, Klaus (2004): “The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere. Towards a Theory of Democratic Functionalism”, European Journal of Social Theory, 7(1): 5-25.
  • TSALIKI, Liza (2002): “Online Forums and the Enlargement of Public Space: Research Findings from a European Project”, The Public, 9(2): 95-112.
  • VALLÉS, Josep M. (2010): “Política Democrática y Comunicación: Un Rapto Consentido”, Revista de Estudios Políticos, 150: 11-50.
  • VALLESPÍN, Fernando (2000): “La crisis del espacio público”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 3: 77-95.
  • YACK, Bernard (2006): “ Rhetoric and Public Reasoning: An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation”, Political Theory, 34(4): 417-438.
  • WESSLER, Hartmut (2008): “Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively”, Political Communication, 25(1): 1-22.