¿Hay verdaderamente una fórmula estándar para el riesgo de suscripción de vida?

  1. Asier Garayeta Bajo 1
  2. J. Iñaki de la Peña Esteban 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revue:
Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

ISSN: 0534-3232

Année de publication: 2017

Número: 23

Pages: 49-70

Type: Article

DOI: 10.26360/2017_3 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

The Solvency II directive allows creating internal models as alternative to the standard formulation. Nevertheless, in this work it is demonstrated that this standard formulation really is not so standard because every insurance company should have to develop its own formulation according to the specifications of every product that commercializes. It concerns, principally to medium and small insurance companies, in average, it is the majority into the Spanish insurance market.

Références bibliographiques

  • Alonso, P. (2007). Solvencia II: Ejes del proyecto y diferencias con Basilea II. Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles 13, 37-56.
  • Armstrong, J. (2005). The forecasting canon: nine generalizations to improve forecast accuracy. Foresight The International Journal of Applied Forecasting 1, 29 – 35.
  • Barañano, A., De La Pena, J. I. y A. Garayeta (2016). Medición del riesgo de suscripción mediante modelos internos en Solvencia II. Revista Innovar Journal Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales 26 (62), 113-128.
  • Berglund, R., Koskinen, L. y V. Ronkainen, V. (2006). Aspects on calculating the solvency capital requirement with the use of internal models. AFIR Colloquium. Paris.
  • Booth, P. y A. D. Morrison (2007). Regulatory competition and life insurance solvency regulation in the European Union and United States. North American Actuarial Journal 114, 23-41.
  • Butt, M. (2007). Insurance, finance, solvency II and financial market interaction. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 32(1), 42–45.
  • Campagne, C., van der Loo, y A. J. Yntema (1948). Contribution to the method of calculating the stabilization reserve in life assurance business. Gedenkboek Verzekeringskamer 1923-1948, Staatsdrukkerij-en uitgeverijbedrijf, Den Haag., 338-378.
  • Campagne, C. (1961). Minimum standards of solvency for insurance firms. Report to the OECD, 11th March, TFD/PC/565.
  • CEIOPS (2005). QIS1, specifications, spreadsheets guidance QIS1 cover note. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors.
  • CEIOPS (2010). QIS5, technical specifications. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors.
  • Chatfield, C. (2001). Time-Series Forecasting. Chapman & Hall. London.
  • Cuoco, D. y H. Liu, H. (2006). An analysis of VaR-based capital requirements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 15(3), 362–394.
  • Devineu, L. y S. Loisel (2009). Risk aggregation in Solvency II: How to converge the approaches of the internal models and those of the standard formula? Bulletin Français d'Actuariat 9 (18), 107-145
  • DGSFP (2012). Resolución de 6 de julio de 2012 de la Dirección General de Seguros y Fondos de Pensiones, en cumplimiento a lo previsto en la disposición adicional única del Real Decreto 1736/2010, de 23 de diciembre, por el que se modifica el Plan de Contabilidad de las Entidades Aseguradoras, aprobado por Real Decreto 1317/2008, de 24 de julio, en relación con las tablas de mortalidad y supervivencia a utilizar por las entidades aseguradoras y al artículo único de la Orden EHA/69/2011, de 21 de enero, por la que se prorroga la utilización de las tablas de supervivencia GRM95 y GRF95 y las tablas de fallecimiento GKM95 y GKF95 en el sistema de planes de pensiones.
  • DGSFP (2014). Memoria estadística anual de entidades aseguradoras, NIPO: 720-14-065-5. Madrid
  • EIOPA (2014). Technical specification for the preparatory phase Part I, European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority.
  • EIOPA (2016). Risk-free interest rate term structure coding. https://eiopa.europa.eu/regulation-supervision/insurance/solvency-iitechnical-information/risk-free-interest-rate-term-structures (3 de abril de 2017).
  • Eling, M., Schmeiser, H. y J. T. Schmit (2007). The Solvency II process: overview and critical analysis. Risk Management and Insurance Review 101, 69-85.
  • Eling, M. y I. Holzmüller (2008). An overview and comparison risk-based capital standards. Journal of Insurance Regulation 264, 31-60.
  • European Commission (2003). Solvency II – Reflections on the general outline of a framework Directive and mandates for further technical work. Note to the IC Solvency Subcommittee MARKT/2539/03.
  • FOPI (2004). White Paper of the Swiss Solvency Test. Federal Office of Private Insurance. http://www.naic.org/documents/committees_smi_int_solvency_switzerla nd_sst_wp.pdf (30 de junio de 2016).
  • Garayeta, A., Iturricastillo, I., y J. I. De La Peña (2012). Evolución del capital de solvencia requerido en las aseguradoras españolas hasta solvencia II. Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles 3(18), 111-150.
  • Helfenstein, R., Scotti, V. y P. Brahin (2004). The Impact of IFRS on the Insurance Industry. Swiss Re Sigma 7, 1-34.
  • Hernández, R. y M. I. Martínez (2012). Capital assessment of operational risk for the solvency of health insurance companies. Journal of Operational Risk 7, 43-65
  • Holzheu, T. (2000). Solvency of Non-Life insurers: balancing security and profitability expectations. Swiss Re Sigma 1, 1–38
  • Holzmüller, I. (2009). The United States RBC standards, Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test: a comparative assessment. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice 34 (1), 56 -77.
  • IASB (2005). The fair value option. Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. International Accounting Standards Board.
  • Kaliva, K., Koskinen L. y V. Ronkainen (2007). Internal models and arbitrage free calibration. AFIR colloquium. http://www.actuaries.org/AFIR/Colloquia/Stockholm/Kaliva.pdf (1 de agosto de 2016).
  • Karp, T. (2007). International solvency requirements – towards more risk based regimes. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 32 (3), 364-381.
  • Liebwein, P. (2006). Risk models for capital adequacy: applications in the context of Solvency II and beyond. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 31(3), 528–550.
  • Lozano, R. (2005). Las implicaciones de Solvencia II en el sector asegurador español. Estabilidad financiera 9, 5970.
  • Pfeifer, D. y D. Strassburger (2008). Solvency II: stability problems with the SCR aggregation formula. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 1, 61 -77 RD 1060/2015.
  • Real Decreto 1060/2015, de 20 de noviembre, de ordenación, supervisión y solvencia de las entidades aseguradoras y reaseguradoras. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad BOE-A-2015-13057.
  • Ronkainen, V., Koskinen, L. y R. Berglund (2007). Topical modelling issues in Solvency II. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2,135-146.
  • Swiss Re (2014). World insurance in 2013: Steering towards recovery. Sigma 33. http://www.swissre.com/sigma/ (30 de junio de 2016).
  • Van Bragt, D., Steehouwer, H. y B. Waalwijk (2010). Market consistent ALM for life insurers steps toward Solvency II. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 351, 92-109.
  • Willemse, W.J. y H. Wolthuis (2006). Risk based solvency norms and their validity. 28th International Congress of Actuaries. Paris. http://www.ica2006.com/Papiers/3012/3012.pdf (1 agosto de 2016).
La source de données: Dialnet