"Inventario de sexismo ambivalente": estandarización y datos normativos con una muestra del País Vasco

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Ayres, M. M., Friedman, C. K., & Leaper, C. (2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women´s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449-460.
• Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Cihangir, S., & Stroebe, K. (2009). The self-fulfilling effects of contemporary sexism: how it affects women's well-being and behavior. In M. Barreto, M. Ryan & M. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 99-123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Chen, Z., Fiske, S., & Lee, T. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765-778.
• Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159-169.
• Feather, N. T., & Boeckmann, R. (2007). Beliefs about gender discrimination in the workplace in the context of affirmative action: effects of gender and ambivalent attitudes in an Australian sample. Sex Roles, 57, 31-42.
• Forbes, G., Collinsworth, L., Jobe, R., Braun, K., & Wise, L. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265-273.
• Fowers, A., & Fowers, B. (2010). Social dominance and sexual self-schema as moderators of sexist reactions to female subtypes. Sex Roles, 62, 468-480.
• Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2011a). Sexismo hostil y benevolente: relaciones con autoconcepto, racismo y sensibilidad intercultural [Hostile and benevolent sexism: relations with self-concept, racism and intercultural sensitivity]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 16, 331-350.
• Garaigordobil. M., & Aliri, J. (2011b). Conexión intergeneracional del sexismo: influencia de variables familiares [Intergenerational connection of sexism: influence of family variables]. Psicothema, 23, 382-387.
• Garaigordobil. M., & Aliri, J. (2012). Parental socialization styles, parents' educational level, and sexist attitudes in adolescence. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 592-603.
• García, P., Palacios, M. S., Torrico, E., & Navarro, Y. (2009). El sexismo ambivalente ¿un predictor de maltrato? [Ambivalent sexism, a predictor of abuse?] Asociación Latinoamericana de Psicología Jurídica y Forense. Retrieved on January 10, 2010, from http://psicologiajuridica.org/psj210.html
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications of gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109- 118.
• Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433-441.
• Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M., & Aguiar de Souza, M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292-297.
• Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. (2003). Evaluación del sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes gallegos/as [Evaluation of ambivalent sexism in Galician students]. Acción Psicológica, 2, 131-136.
• Lameiras, M., Rodríguez, Y., Calado, M., Foltz, M., & Carrera, M. V. (2006). Expressiveinstrumental traits and sexist attitudes among Spanish university professors. Social Indicators Research, 80, 583-599.
• Lameiras, M., Rodríguez, Y., Calado, M., Foltz, M., & González, M. (2006). Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choice. Sex Roles, 55, 267-272.
• Lameiras, M., Rodríguez, Y., & González, M. (2004). Evolution of hostile sexism and benevolent sexism in a Spanish sample. Social Indicators Research, 66, 197-211.
• Lee, I., Pratto, F., & Li, M. (2007). Social relationships and sexism in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 595-612.
• Pozo, C., Martos, M. J., & Alonso, E. (2010). Do students in secondary education manifest sexist attitudes? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 541-560.
• Russell, B., & Trigg, K. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: an examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565-573.
• Sakalli-Ugurlu, N. (2010). Ambivalent sexism, gender, and major as predictors of Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women and men’s atypical educational choices. Sex Roles, 62, 427-437.
• Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Sila Yalcin, Z., & Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students' attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57, 889-895.
• Tasdemir, N., & Sakalli-Ugurlu, N. (2010). The relationship between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62, 420-426.
• Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: plus ça change, plus c’est pareil [Neosexism: the more it changes, the more it stays the same]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
• Travaglia, L. K., Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 599-604.
• Vaamonde, J. D. (2010). Valores y sexismo en adolescentes argentinos [Values and sexism in Argentinean adolescents]. Revista Salud & Sociedad, 1, 113-124.
• Viki, G., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The "true" romantic: benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533-537.
• Wiener, R., & Hurt, L. (2000). How do people evaluate social sexual conduct at work? A psycholegal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 75-85.