Economía experimental y del comportamiento

Références bibliographiques

• Akerlof, G. & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715-753.
• Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. & Miller, L. (2010). Personal identity. A theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3), 261-275.
• Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P. & Miller, L. M. (2008). Moral Distance in Dictator games. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 344-354.
• Andersen, S., Harrison, G. H., Lau, M. I. & Rutström, E. (2010). Behavioral Econometrics for Psychologists, Journal of Economic Psychology 31(4), 553-576.
• Ballester, C. & Hernández, P. (2011). Bounded Rationality. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Bardsley, N., Cubitt, R., Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., Starmer, C. & Sugden, R. (2010). Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness, An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Boston: Brandford Books, MIT Press.
• Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 122–142.
• Binmore, K. & Shaked, A. (2010). Experimental economics: Where next?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 73, 87–100.
• Bolton, G. & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition. American Economic Review 90, 166-193.
• Bosch-Domènech, A., Nagel, R., Satorra & J. GarcíaMontalvo (2002). One, Two, (Three), Infinity: A Comparison of Behavior of Newspaper Readers, Game Theorists and Students in Beauty-Contest Experiments. American Economic Review 92(5), 1687-1701.
• Brandts, J. & Fatas, E. (2011). The puzzle of Social Preferences. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Brandts, J. (2009). La Economía Experimental y la Economía del Comportamiento. En J. C. García-Bermejo (Ed.), Sobre la Economía y sus Métodos (pp. 125-142). Madrid: Trotta.
• Brandts, J. & Charness, G. (2000). Hot vs. Cold: Sequential Responses and Preference Stability in Experimental Games. Experimental Economics 2(3), 227-238.
• Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Espinosa, M. P., Jiménez, N., Kovarik, J. & Ponti, G. (2011a). Degree heterogeneity and prosocial norms in social networks. mimeo.
• Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. & Repolles, M. (2011b). Time discounting and pain anticipation: Experimental evidence. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Brañas-Garza, P. & Georgantzís, N. (2011c). Experimental and behavioral economics: Theory, tools and topics. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Espinosa, M. P., Jiménez, N., Kovarik, J. & Ponti, G. (2010). Altruism and Social Integration. Games & Economic Behavior 69(2), 249-257.
• Brañas-Garza, P., Duran, M. & Espinosa, M.P. (2009a). The role of personal involvement and responsalibility in unfair decision: a classroom investigation. Rationality & Society 21(2), 225-248.
• Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. & García, T. (2009b). Expectativas sobre comportamiento egoísta. Cuadernos Económicos del ICE 77, 33-43.
• Brañas-Garza, P. (2007). Promoting generous behavior with framing in Dictator games. Journal of Economic Psychology 28(4): 477-486.
• Brañas-Garza, P. (2006). Poverty in Dictator Games: Awakening Solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(3), 306-320.
• Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princenton, NJ: Princenton University Press.
• Camerer, C. & Weber, R. (2006). Behavioral Experiments in Economics. Experimental Economics 9, 187-192.
• Camerer, C. & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature XLIII, 9–64.
• Camerer, C., Ho, T.K. & Chong, J. K. (2004). A Cognitive Hierarchy Theory of One-shot Games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3), 861-898.
• Coricelli, G. & Nagel, R. (2011). The neural basis of bounded rational behavior. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Coricelli, G. & Nagel, R. (2009). Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(23), 9163-9168.
• Crawford, V. P. & Iriberri, N. (2007). Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions? Econometrica 75(6), 1721-1770.
• Croson, R. & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 1-27.
• Cutler, D. & Glaeser, E. (2005). What Explains Differences in Smoking, Drinking and Other Health-Related Behaviors?. American Economic Review 95(2), 238-242.
• Chamberlin, E. H. (1948). An Experimental Imperfect Market. Journal of Political Economy 56(2): 95-108
• Charness, G. & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises & Partnership. Econometrica 74, 1579-1601.
• Charness, G. & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817-869.
• Dana, J., Weber, R. A., Kuang, J. X. (2007). Exploiting Moral Wiggle Room: Experiments Demonstrating an Illusory Preference for Fairness. Economic Theory 33(1), 67–80.
• Davis, D. & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princenton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Ergun, S., García-Muñoz, T. & M. F. Rivas (2011). Gender Differences in Economic Experiments. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Espinosa, M. P., Kovárík, J. & Ponti, G. (2011). Strategic Interaction and Conventions. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 817-868.
• Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G. & Riedl, A. (1998). Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets, European Economic Review 42(1), 1–34.
• Fiore, S. M., Harrison, G. W., Hughes, C. E.& Rutström, E. (2009). Virtual Experiments and Environmental Policy. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 57(1), 65-86.
• Friedman, D. & Sunder, S. (1994). Experimental Methods. A Primer for Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fréchette, G. & Schotter, A. (2010). The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. & M. Parravano (2011). The lottery-panel task for bi-dimensional parameter-free elicitation of risk attitudes. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
• Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C., Poldrack, R.A. & Fehr, E. (2008). Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. NY: Academic Press.
• Gneezy, U., Niederle, M. & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1049-1074.
• Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 367-388.
• Harrison, G. W. & Rutström, E. (2008). Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Experiments. En C.R. Plott and V.L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results I (pp. 752-767). New York: Elsevier.
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Gintis, H., McElreath, R. & Fehr, E. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: Experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91(2): 73–79.
• Kagel, J. y A. Roth (Eds.) (1995). The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Kanheman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263 292.
• Laibson, D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 62, 443-478.
• Loewenstein, G. (1999). Experimental Economics from the vantage-point of Behavioral Economics. The Economic Journal 109, 25-34.
• May, K. O. (1954). Intransitivity, Utility and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns. Econometrica 22, 1-13.
• Miller L. M. (2006). The Double Nature of Conventions - An Experimental Analysis. Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-07, Max Planck Institute of Economics Jena.
• Miller L. M. (2008). Two notions of conventions: an experimental analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics 4 (3), 327-349.
• Nagel, R. (1995). Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study. American Economic Review 85(5), 1313-1326.
• Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness Into Economics and Game Theory. American Economic Review 83, 1281-1302.
• Rey-Biel, P. (2008). Economía Experimental y Teoría de Juegos. En F. Aguiar, J. Barragan y N. Lara (Eds.). Economía, Sociedad y Teoría de Juegos (pp. 137-152). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
• Rojo, D. (2010). On the content of focal points. CBESS working paper 10.16, University of East Anglia.
• Selten, R. (1978). The equity principle in economic behavior. En: Gottinger, H., Leinfellner, W. (Eds.). Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Reidel.
• Sauermann, H. & Selten, R. (1959). Ein Oligopolexperiment. Z. ges. Staatswissen 115, 427-471.
• Smith, V. L. (1964). Experimental Auction Markets and the Walrasian Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy 73, 181-201.
• Smith, V. L. (1962). An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 70, 111-137.
• Schelling, T. (1963). The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Tucker, A. W. (1950). A Two-Person Dilemma. Stanford University Working Paper (also published as (1980). On Jargon: The Prisoner’s Dilemma. UMSP Journal 1, 101).
• Vega, F. (2007). Complex Social Networks. Econometric Society Monograph Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weber, R. A. & Dawes, R. (2005). Behavioral Economics. En: N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.) Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 90-108). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.